EMDR Research and Bibliography
Non Randomized Studies
Devilly, G.J., & Spence, S.H. (1999). The relative efficacy and treatment distress of EMDR and a cognitive
behavioral trauma treatment protocol in the amelioration of post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety
Disorders, 13, 131-157.
The only EMDR research study that found CBT superior to EMDR. The study is marred by poor treatment
delivery and higher expectations in the CBT condition. Treatment was delivered in both conditions by the developer
of the CBT protocol.
Fernandez, I., Gallinari, E., & Lorenzetti, A. (2004). A school- based EMDR intervention for children who
witnessed the Pirelli building airplane crash in Milan, Italy. Journal of Brief Therapy, 2,129-136.
A group intervention of EMDR was provided to 236 schoolchildren exhibiting PTSD symptoms 30 days
post-incident. At four-month follow up, teachers reported that all but two children evinced a return to normal
functioning after treatment.
Grainger, R.D., Levin, C., Allen-Byrd, L. , Doctor, R.M. & Lee, H. (1997). An empirical evaluation of eye movement
desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) with survivors of a natural catastrophe. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 10, 665-671.
A study of Hurricane Andrew survivors found significant differences on the Impact of Event Scale
and subjective distress in a comparison of EMDR and non-treatment condition.
Puffer, M.; Greenwald, R. & Elrod, D. (1997). A single session EMDR study with twenty traumatized children and
adolescents. Traumatology-e, 3(2), Article 6.
In this delayed treatment comparison, over half of the participants moved from clinical to normal
levels on the Impact of Events Scale, and all but 3 showed at least partial symptom relief on several measures at
1-3 m following a single EMDR session.
Silver, S.M., Brooks, A., & Obenchain, J. (1995). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing treatment of
Vietnam war veterans with PTSD: Comparative effects with biofeedback and relaxation training. Journal of Traumatic
Stress, 8, 337-342.
One of only two EMDR research studies that evaluated a clinically relevant course of EMDR treatment with
combat veterans (e.g., more than one or two memories; see Carlson et al., above). The analysis of an inpatient veterans'
PTSD program (n=100) found EMDR to be vastly superior to biofeedback and relaxation training on seven of eight measures.
Silver, S.M., Rogers, S., Knipe, J., & Colelli, G. (in press). EMDR therapy following the 9/11 terrorist attacks:
A community-based intervention project in New York City. International Journal of Stress Management.
Clients made highly significant positive gains on a range of outcome variables, including validated
psychometrics and self-report scales. Analyses of the data indicate that EMDR is a useful treatment intervention both
in the immediate aftermath of disaster as well as later.
Solomon, R.M. & Kaufman, T.E. (2002). A peer support workshop for the treatment of traumatic stress of railroad
personnel: Contributions of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Journal of Brief Therapy, 2, 27-33,
60 railroad employees who had experienced fatal grade accident crossing accidents were evaluated for
workshop outcomes, and for the additive effects of EMDR treatment. Although the workshop was successful, in this setting,
the addition of a short session of EMDR (5-40 minutes) led to significantly lower, sub clinical, scores which further
decreased at follow up.
Sprang, G. (2001). The use of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in the treatment of traumatic
stress and complicated mourning: Psychological and behavioral outcomes. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 300-320.
In a multi-site study, EMDR significantly reduced symptoms more often than the CBT treatment on behavioral
measures, and on four of five psychosocial measures. EMDR was more efficient, inducing change at an earlier stage and
requiring fewer sessions.
|
|
|